SESH FRAGRANCE ACADEMY | ADVANCED
Why can a volume-based formula disagree with a mass-based one?
Linalool contains an OH alcohol group. One functional group is insufficient to predict every molecule’s odour or the performance of a mixture.
Open full-size image ↗Solve mass-based dilution problems, propagate stock concentrations and identify unit or rounding errors.
Units first, calculations second
Define each variable as grams, mass fraction or % w/w. Never mix milliliters with grams without justified density conversion. For an illustrative stock solution, material mass = stock mass × its fractional concentration; final mass = sum of all material masses. These arithmetic exercises do not certify the skin safety of actual fragrance-material dilutions.
A stock is not pure ingredient
Ten grams of a hypothetical 10% w/w stock of material X contains 1 g X and 9 g stock solvent. Recording '10 g ingredient' as though it were pure X would overstate X tenfold. When a stock is added to a fragrance blend, track both the active material and its solvent contribution separately.
Oil droplets dispersed in water: a real emulsion example, not a photograph of a SESH formula or proof of cream efficacy.
Open full-size image ↗Mass-based dilution equation
When adding only solvent, the analyte mass remains constant: C1 × m1 = C2 × m2 for mass fractions. Ten grams of 10% stock contains 1 g material; a 5% final fraction would require 20 g total, so the illustrative addition is 10 g compatible solvent. Arithmetic does not establish that a real material dissolves or is safe in that solvent.
Combine stocks without losing active content
Combine hypothetical 4 g of 25% stock with 6 g of 5% stock of the same solute: the active masses are 1.0 g and 0.3 g. Total active = 1.3 g in 10 g combined solution, giving 13% w/w. The simple average of 25% and 5% is wrong because the two starting masses differ; a mass-weighted result is required.
The total must reconcile
Suppose a concept worksheet lists 35%, 25%, 22% and 15% for major categories. That sums to 97%, leaving 3% undocumented. Do not silently assign it to ethanol or water without a real formulation decision. If a table sums to 103%, reconcile it before using the model. A complete mass fraction accounting must equal 100%.
Precision depends on actual measurement
Writing 0.0001 g does not make a scale capable of measuring it, nor does it increase the accuracy of a supplier's purity data. Preserve sufficient precision through intermediate calculations and round the reported output appropriately. Potent or sensitizing fragrance materials require qualified facilities, not improvised home reproduction of numeric exercises.
A numerical pass is not a safety pass
Before practical use, verify material identities, lot records, units, solubility, stability and applicable finished-product IFRA restrictions. Contributions of the same restricted constituent from different sources must be combined. Mathematical consistency prevents bookkeeping mistakes; it never replaces a full safety assessment.
Case: the false 15% average
Four grams at 25% and six grams at 5% contain 1.3 g active in 10 g combined, or 13% rather than 15%. The lesson demonstrates mass-weighted combination, not an approved fragrance mixture or solvent choice.
Practical case and exercise
Solve three paper problems: dilute 20 g of 8% stock to 4%; combine 5 g of 20% stock with 15 g of 4% stock; and audit a formula totaling 98.5% without inventing a missing ingredient.
Concept maps and key ideas
Mass-fraction equations
- Solute mass = stock mass × mass fraction
- C1 × m1 = C2 × m2
- Sum of component masses = final mass
Weighted dilution example
- 4g × 25% = 1.0g active
- 6g × 5% = 0.3g active
- 1.3g ÷ 10g = 13%
Common calculation traps
- mL is not always grams
- Stock is not pure solute
- Mass fractions total 100%
- Math accuracy ≠ safety approval
Scientific glossary
- Stock solution
- Solution containing a known mass fraction of solute.
- Weighted average
- Average weighted by the masses of the contributions.
Further scientific reference
Reference starting points for fragrance terminology and verification: IFRA Fragrance Standards · PubChem